<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Write an Optimised Article</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wealthydragon.com/blog/2009/10/16/write-an-optimised-article/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wealthydragon.com/blog/2009/10/16/write-an-optimised-article/</link>
	<description>Hype-Free Internet Marketing Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: WealthyDragon</title>
		<link>http://www.wealthydragon.com/blog/2009/10/16/write-an-optimised-article/comment-page-1/#comment-2836</link>
		<dc:creator>WealthyDragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 23:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wealthydragon.com/blog/?p=1353#comment-2836</guid>
		<description>Brad, hi,

Yes - it&#039;s a trick I learnt when I was a student.  I&#039;d create what I thought was a great piece of work, hand it in and get a terrible response from the lecturer.  And when I read my piece again I understood why - it didn&#039;t flow at all.

The reason is that when you&#039;re writing an article you know what you want to say so when you read it back you know what you mean.  Reading it later, when you&#039;ve forgotten your train of thought, shows up the points you need to amplify so that someone reading it for the first time knows what you&#039;re on about.

Cheers,

Martin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad, hi,</p>
<p>Yes &#8211; it&#8217;s a trick I learnt when I was a student.  I&#8217;d create what I thought was a great piece of work, hand it in and get a terrible response from the lecturer.  And when I read my piece again I understood why &#8211; it didn&#8217;t flow at all.</p>
<p>The reason is that when you&#8217;re writing an article you know what you want to say so when you read it back you know what you mean.  Reading it later, when you&#8217;ve forgotten your train of thought, shows up the points you need to amplify so that someone reading it for the first time knows what you&#8217;re on about.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Martin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Harmon</title>
		<link>http://www.wealthydragon.com/blog/2009/10/16/write-an-optimised-article/comment-page-1/#comment-2834</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Harmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wealthydragon.com/blog/?p=1353#comment-2834</guid>
		<description>I like tip #3 where you walk away for a while then come back and edit.  I am editing too much while I am writing my posts and also right after I am finished.  I think taking a step away then coming back to edit would do my writing a lot of good.
.-= Brad Harmon´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://bradleyaharmon.com/2009/10/will-christian-entrepreneurs-be-able-to-squeeze-through/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Will Christian Entrepreneurs Be Able to Squeeze Through?&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like tip #3 where you walk away for a while then come back and edit.  I am editing too much while I am writing my posts and also right after I am finished.  I think taking a step away then coming back to edit would do my writing a lot of good.<br />
<span class="cluv"> Brad Harmon´s last blog ..<a href="http://bradleyaharmon.com/2009/10/will-christian-entrepreneurs-be-able-to-squeeze-through/" rel="nofollow">Will Christian Entrepreneurs Be Able to Squeeze Through?</a> </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
